:bwuhaha: Gotta remember that one!!Dr.Jass said:Actually, it's "Constantly Having Every Vehicle Recalled Over Lousy Engineering Techniques" but who's keeping track?![]()
Dr.Jass said:The Heartbeat of America... a Camaro with a rod knock.![]()
Dr.Jass said:"There wasn't a redline, so I shifted it at the highest number."
:doh:
firefighter3931 said:Those rockers are indestructable...they'll be the last thing to break !
firefighter3931 said:Is it balanced ? How much oil in the pan ? stock pan ?
It'll probably suck the pan dry, assuming it's the stock pan. The short stroke will help it live, assuming the rods are in descent shape. I'd bet you don't have enough valvespring to pull that much rpm....can you say valve float. That cam will be all done by 6000 rpm powerwise, anyway. Those rockers are indestructable...they'll be the last thing to break !![]()
Ron
Stretch said:Did you miss the titanium valve train part? That stuff is incredibly light! I doubt the valves will float I do agree with the cam leaving the party before the carnage shows up though.
Dr.Jass said:Well, though I don't trust its horsepower figures, I'm told the curve is fairly accurate in Desktop Dyno... and with the solid stick and small cubes (remember, this is a 318, not a 400+ inch engine--and my 284°/.484" juice cam ripped to way over 6 grand in my 440), it should peak out at horsepower around 7000 and has about 25 more horsepower at 8000 than it does at 4000.
But, as I said, if anyone wants to sling me a cam of greater dimensions, I'm open to adopt one... I'd like to get a 284°/.528" MP solid, actually, but I'm done spending money on this one.
I don't think the stock non-HV pump will cause the (stock) pan to run dry, nor do I think valvespring pressure will be a problem (Lunati double springs and the titanium goodies pretty-much ensure that). The spring pressures look good through about 7500 on steel valves, and the titanium weighs over 35% less.
Besides, Stretch will be driving, and he won't lift until I tell him to do so... and I'll be too busy running the camcorder.![]()
:shifty:firefighter3931 said:I guess the point is yes maybe it can rpm to 8k (jazz's 318) but will it make power at that rpm ? If not, why do it...
Ron, this isn't the final engine for the car... it's just an experiment. I have two 340s, a 360, a 400 and a 440 all lying around but all the stuff for the 318 is already there. The ex-GF left the tunnel ram, a pair of Holleys, a set of 5.13s, etc. here when she moved to MN so I just figured I'd overkill the poor 318 and see what lets go first. It ain't about ultimate HP or lowest elapsed time, it's about finding the fuse in a stock 318.Dr.Jass said:...because I'm a twisted individual with... this cute little 138,000-mile '85 318HP shorblock sitting innocently in the corner, the decision has been made to find its limits.
Da-ho said:You might want to consider just a few oiling system mods- just to be on the safe side. Outside of that it should be a fun little engine.:giggedy:
Dr.Jass said::shifty:
Ron, this isn't the final engine for the car... it's just an experiment. I have two 340s, a 360, a 400 and a 440 all lying around but all the stuff for the 318 is already there. The ex-GF left the tunnel ram, a pair of Holleys, a set of 5.13s, etc. here when she moved to MN so I just figured I'd overkill the poor 318 and see what lets go first. It ain't about ultimate HP or lowest elapsed time, it's about finding the fuse in a stock 318.
Oh, yeah... I know better than to break it in with doubles. Should the cam survive, I'll probably want to use it again. :dance:
Now go find me a bigger cam, for free.![]()