Car of the Week: 1966 Ford Mustang

dodgechargerfan

In a 55 gallon drum, floating down river, and
Staff member
ImageUploadedByTapatalk HD1350758111.662401.jpg

When Scott Meadows brought his 1966 Mustang coupe into Jeff Lilly Restorations in Helote, Texas, the little black 289 V-8-powered “pony” looked like a good “20 footer.” But Jeff Lilly knew better. Little hints, from the twisted bumpers to misaligned fenders, indicated the Mustang had been battered in the past. Lilly’s experience in restoration also told him that multiple repaints can hide a lot of defects on a 45-year-old car, especially when that old car is an early Mustang with a few bumps and bruises.

The recent restoration also set out to correct some of the manufacturing flaws when the car was originally mass produced in 1966. Ford was starting to build its second million run of Mustangs in 1966, offering them in hardtop, convertible and 2+2 fastback models built in plants at Dearborn, Mich.; San Jose, Calif.; and Metuchen, N.J. The cars were available with three- or four-speed manual transmissions or the C-4 automatic behind the 200-cid six-cylinder or one of three 289-cid V-8 engines with V-8 power ratings of 200, 225 or 271 hp. Buyers preferred the V-8 engine, with 58.3 percent of 1966 Mustangs receiving one of the 289 engines.

For 1966, Mustang prices slightly increased with Ford raising the price of the hardtop by $44, the 2+2 by $18 in its second full year on the market and the convertible by $49. That brought the base price of 1966 Mustangs to $2,416 for the hardtop, $2,607 for the 2+2 fastback and $2,653 for the convertible. For 1966, Ford built 607,568 Mustangs, with 72,119 being convertibles, 35,698 of them 2+2 fastbacks and 499,751 of them hardtop coupes, including the project car undertaken by Jeff Lilly Restorations.

Read more.
 
Mustang coupe: The fat feamle secretary's car. If it's not a fastback, it's not worth reading, I don't care how nice or rare it is.
 
If it's not a fastback, it's not worth reading,

If you would read it you would learn that it's not even a 'restored' mustang, but a 'reproduction'.
It's had the cowl, roof, floors and quarters replaced, among other parts. What's left of the original besides the doors & hood? :huh:
 
Putting that kind of effort and money into a notchback Mustang is just plain stupidity... you couldn't find a clean one out of the nearly 500,000 others built? OK, probably not... still, it's a notchback. It's a girl's car. Dude probably listens to show tunes with his wedding tackle tucked between his legs.
 
Well, you convinced me to read the entire article... I'm even more flabbergasted now than I was previously. Talk about pissing away huge sums of money! He could never recover financially from something like that. I hope it's a family heirloom because it's essentially worthless in the marketplace no matter how nice it is.
 
I get customers that come in looking for parts for their 1st gen Mustangs, and act like they have a GOLDMINE! *we need an eye roll smiley thing*

I usually just glaze over and show no interest in their car. I'll help them with what I can, sure but don't be surprised when I don't wanna come outside and see your car. :dgt:
 
Unless it's a Boss or a Mach 1 or even certain Shelby's, I have no interest in Mustangs.
 
I'm the same way. It's like they want you to faint when they tell you they have an old Mustang. If they get persistent about how impressive their car is, I usually respond with something like, "Yeah, it's like one of 600,000 built that year. Very rare." :D
 
I like the '67-68's and '71-73's Sportsroofs only in the latter group. Any year Shelby, particularly the '67-70. 64.5-66 blech :dgt:

When I was in HS there was a girl that lived up the street with a '68 390 GT convert! That was a sweet ride, dark green with a black top and interior.
 
Mustang coupe: The fat feamle secretary's car. If it's not a fastback, it's not worth reading, I don't care how nice or rare it is.

:)

I've worked on quite a few Mustangs over the years and for this one to need the cowl replaced... that tells me it was one Hell of a turd. Who says you can't shine a turd? :)

A lot of people go ga ga over restored or rebuilt Mustangs, but they've got to be one of the easiest cars ever to repair and they're not terribly strong or well built from the factory.
 
70 sanding blocks used in the body and prep work????
Something wrong there... I've got roughly 8 or 9 sanding blocks/boards and there is not a car built that I can't get straight with those blocks, especially if I coat everything with a skim of filler, like they did with this one.
 

SiteLock

SiteLock
Back
Top