Car of the Week: 1965 Ford Galaxie 500 XL

dodgechargerfan

In a 55 gallon drum, floating down river, and
Staff member
1965-Galaxie-10-1.jpg

When Russ and Sandy Kuenstler were snooping around for a new collector car to play with a few years back, there wasn’t much doubt what kind of car they’d wind up. Sandy had already settled on mid-1960s Ford Galaxies as her favorite machines, so it was almost a forgone conclusion that the New Berlin, Wis., couple would wind up with another one.

The latest, and best, of her stable of Galaxies is the pair’s striking 1965 Galaxie 500 XL convertible, outfitted in bright red with a gleaming white interior. The car makes the rounds of the Wisconsin car show circuit in the summertime, and the Kuenstlers are happiest when they are caravanning from show to show, top down, enjoy their glorious convertible cruiser.

“This is my fourth one,” Sandy notes proudly. “One of them was a Ford Custom, the other three were Galaxies. I just like that car. It’s my favorite…. And the top stays down. Always! About the only time we ever put it up is if we get caught someplace and it starts raining.”

Read more.
 
I love/loved most of the cars I've owned.. While I may end up with something similar, I can't say that given a budget I would seek out one of the same.. There's so much out there. If you love them so much, why not hang on to the second one? I'll assume that unfortunate circumstances forced most of us to part with the first version of a car we loved.
 
I've thought about my previous statement, and how it might cheese people here off.. I know many of us have owned or do own multiples of the same style car. As an example, I've got three of the same Volvo as far as most people care. I guess the way I meant to phrase it was, "your dream car is one you've already owned three of?"

PS.. Also can be taken as inflammatory, but not the post's intent
 
A ford couple are proud of their ford car......yawn.....oh well....:dgt:
 
I've thought about my previous statement, and how it might cheese people here off.. I know many of us have owned or do own multiples of the same style car. As an example, I've got three of the same Volvo as far as most people care. I guess the way I meant to phrase it was, "your dream car is one you've already owned three of?"

PS.. Also can be taken as inflammatory, but not the post's intent
Don't sweat it.
Very few people here get cheesed off about stuff posted here. You might get a rebuttal, but that's usually as far as it goes.
That's one of the great things about here: We're all pretty much adults. :)
 
I prefer the slightly later, fastback version.




Then again, with few exceptions I've always viewed convertibles as chick cars.
 
i had a 66..bought it for 100$(93?) DROVE it home on 3 flats..later to find out it had a cracked block..split from the cam up to the head (390)...bloody HATED that car..bought it as parts for my 58 ford..never used even a bolt off the car..left it on teh side of the road some years later..yes..it was a 2dr..those cars do NOTHING for me

iron..if i made a list of everything i curently have and a list of everything i had..your statements would sound like my own
 
Though I'm a fan of stacked-headlamp designs, this one almost seems to want to hide their vertical orientation among a sea of wide horizontal cues. As 71ChargerR/T mentioned, the later cars were a much better design.

As far as TheNodularKnockwurst's thoughts, I totally get what you're saying but as badly as I wanted to hang onto my first Challenger the logisitics involved at the time were impossible. The car needed the entire front suspension rebuilt, itself beyond my means in '88, but more importantly there were no reproduction panels yet being made other than very-crappy quarter skins. Everything behind the rear axle kickup was either shot or just plain gone; opening the trunk allowed one to not only view one's own footwear, but half the fuel tank and both rear tires. There was literally no frame rail on the LH side after the kickup. I'd simply wedged the car's bumper jack into the remains of the kickup, and the other end used the jacking mechanism itself as a "load spreader" against the back bumper and taillamp panel. I drove it like that until the day I sold it, often at speeds over 120MPH--I buried the 7K tach in fourth gear the day I sold it, in fact. The bumper was so tilted the LH taillamp was just visible enough as to not get me pulled over. It was a deathtrap I happened to survive and I was the last one to drive it.

I loved that car dearly but it just wasn't in the cards to keep it. Beyond the difficulties outlined above, my parents didn't understand the car fetish at all, and we lived in a fairly well-to-do neighborhood. Storing the car until the technology and parts to revive it came along wasn't even a possibility. So even though I already had the car back in the '80s, there was simply no way I could keep the car then. Too many cards stacked against me.

When E-body prices truly went berserk, I just gave up on the idea of ever owning another one and switched my allegiances to '71/'72 Chargers. I knew that if I ever got another Challenger, it would be a '72-'74 car and I'd sort of finish what I started back in '88--but none of that seemed possible for a very long time. Thanks to v8440, it's happening now, though admittedly very slowly. A lot of what I wanted back then (spoilers, Six Pack, flip-top fuel filler) no longer appeal to me, but I still plan to make it close enough to what I had to make some people think they're seeing a ghost.

As far as my V-code '71 Super Bee, believe me: There's no joy in owning a 1-of-1 project car. You almost have to restore it, and do it right, and once you do you'll forever be paranoid about wrecking it. I'd have been too terrified to drive it. Cars like that are for collectors or museums and I want no part of just saying "I own one" without being able to enjoy it eventually. Had they made even 25 of 'em it might still rank as a dream car for me, but its rarity means I'm totally OK with it being someone else's dream. Dumping $50K+ into a NOM museum piece carries no appeal for me.
 

SiteLock

SiteLock
Back
Top