Bought a new car!!!

71ChargerRT

Well-known member
Well new to me anyway. It's a '71 Polara 9 pass. wagon, 360/auto. :giggedy:
I'm also trading my Barracuda to my Spawn for his Durango :shifty: I need a kid hauler, and I'm thinking about buying an '04 Stang GT. Here is a pic of the wagon, I'll get more this weekend when I bring it home.
 

Attachments

  • new car.jpg
    new car.jpg
    5.6 KB · Views: 46
We had a '69 Polara 9-pass when I was a kid, in the same color combo. It was a 440 standard-perf trailering-package car... a parts dream machine: HD 727, huge 3-row radiator, 3.55SG, auxiliary trans cooler, PS cooler, etc. My folks traded it August 24th of '77--my birthday--on a damned 400M LTD Country Squire :doh:. The Polara sat on the lot for a few years, but when the spare tire fell out because it was so rusty the dealer parked it out back and let it continue to rot away. It was still back there when I started working at that dealership in early '87, but they refused to sell it to me because it was "too rusty--it's not safe" for street use. Hell, I just wanted it for parts! The 440 ended up in one of their mechanics' garages as a backup for his mud truck, and the whole rest of the car went straight to the crusher... not even a short stay at a junkyard. :(
 
holy moly! My brother had one like that when I was in High School, I even drove it for 6 months or so after I got my license. His had a little 383 though ;)

Nice one!
 
We had a '69 Polara 9-pass when I was a kid, in the same color combo. It was a 440 standard-perf trailering-package car... a parts dream machine: HD 727, huge 3-row radiator, 3.55SG, auxiliary trans cooler, PS cooler, etc. My folks traded it August 24th of '77--my birthday--on a damned 400M LTD Country Squire :doh:.

Oh my Jesus, what a turd. I had a '76 ltd 2 door with a 400, and it wouldn't pull a sick whore out of bed. What in fuck's name did they think that pos was gonna do better than the polara? Maybe back then people didn't realized just how underpowered and what shitty mileage most of the 70's stuff got. I mean, sometime around then the 400 got down to a CLAIMED 7.33:1 compression ratio.
 
Anyway, to the original poster, I think you'll find that when running right, the '71 360 2 bbl is surprisingly strong. I know mine yanks the newport around with no problem at all. In fact, on a conservative dyno, it laid down 163 hp and about 255 ft/lbs at the wheels. It's rated at 175 net hp, so it's obviously making more than rated to come out with only 12 hp less at the wheels than what chrysler claimed at the crankshaft. The only modification is a dual exhaust. No headers, no crossover pipe, still has points ignition and 2 bbl carb.
 
Oh my Jesus, what a turd. I had a '76 ltd 2 door with a 400, and it wouldn't pull a sick whore out of bed. What in fuck's name did they think that pos was gonna do better than the polara?
My parents were not "car people" in the least. Cars are appliances. The Polara was in pretty sorry shape by late '77, and to be honest, it was fairly junky for not being that old. Armrests falling off, glovebox that would open randomly, rearmost seatback half detached, and other nagging little problems signed the death warrant.

Funny thing about it: they did live to regret that purchase. At no time during that LTD's life (and I do mean life--we were the only family ever to own that heap) did it ever achieve double-digit fuel economy. It averaged right around 7MPG, which was alarming since the fuel gauge never worked. It broke the day after we got the car and was never fixed, try though the dealer might. Every time you turned the key it was a crapshoot as to where the gauge would be. If Mom started the car and it read less than half, she'd top it off. That thing must've run out of fuel 30 times by the time we got rid of it, always with the gauge happily reading more than half a tank.

At 227K miles, a bright light that read HOT lit on the dash, and my sister apparently felt the car was paying her a compliment so she smiled and kept going the 25 miles home. I put coolant in it and it didn't go far for a while, so Mom didn't notice what I assumed to be a blown head gasket. Sure enough, a week later Sarah had it out at camp again and overheated it on the way home, cheerily noting the huge cloud behind her the entire way. More coolant, then Mom took it somewhere. I was in the garage working on my bike when she came back. She went in the house, and couple minutes later it started belching steam out the driver's wheel well and making a sound like a Canadian goose stuck in Chicago traffic. This went on for a good 2 minutes.

The same dealer that got the Polara gave Mom $250 trade on the LTD... with a blown head gasket, cracked head, and cracked block. It was in their back lot for about a week before it met its doom in the same jaws as the C-wagon.

And, in the classic fashion of colossal mistakes coming in threes, that $250 credit was applied to a shiny new red base-model 1984 Escort four-door. :doh: That car is a thread unto itself... and the last Ford my parents would ever own.
 
Wagon tanks are specific to the C's and they are not reproduced to my knowledge....but they did use the same tank in all Dodge, Plymouth, Chrysler C-body wagons from 69 to 72-73? I believe...the later 74-78 might be the same but I'm not sure on that one.
 
Mid-year 1971 they switched up the tank, depending on the number of vent lines. Yes, the style is the same and it will bolt into the car, but 1970-early '71 cars have two vent lines, whereas the later cars have four (and even that's not law, as far as build dates). Realistically, you can cap a couple of the vents but you need to make sure you cap the right ones. The end-around--if you have a two-vent car and a four-vent tank--is to run your existing vent lines to their closest counterparts, and run a hose from one remaining vent to the other. I ran into this issue using a four-vent tank on my '72 that only had two vent lines, and never had an issue, except the four-vent tank had the vent fittings in a totally-different location than the two-vent unit.

The weird part was that my '72 Charger SE was built in 9/71 and had the four-vent system. I swapped that tank into my '72 Rallye, built well into '72 (April, I think) and that car had a two-vent system. The SE was a 400 Magnum car sold new in FL, and the Rallye was a 318-2v car that originally sold in PA... so I don't put a lot of stock in the mid-year change thing.
 
The weird part was that my '72 Charger SE was built in 9/71 and had the four-vent system. I swapped that tank into my '72 Rallye, built well into '72 (April, I think) and that car had a two-vent system. The SE was a 400 Magnum car sold new in FL, and the Rallye was a 318-2v car that originally sold in PA... so I don't put a lot of stock in the mid-year change thing.


Perhaps the 2-vent vs. 4-vent thing has more to do with what plant each car was assembled in rather then a specific date. One plant may have used it’s two vent stock up sooner or perhaps one was built for California or something.

Did they even have California cars in ’72?:huh:
 
I checked the VIN from the Rallye, and both it and the SE were built in St. Louis. I don't know if there were CA emissions in '72; I don't think there were.

On a side note, though: CA had stricter noise regulations if what I read many years ago is true. Starting in 1970, California-delivery Six Pack and Hemi cars supposedly were not available with bright exhaust tips--they had to have turndowns to pass Cali's drive-by noise regulations. I probably still have the article somewhere but I haven't seen it in probably 15+ years... it was a loaded yellow '70 big-block Cuda convertible, either a Six Pack or a Hemi, and it had a standard valance and turndowns. It's the only one I ever recall seeing so equipped.
 
On Mopars? I don't ever remember seeing any references to 'em. I thought everything in the early emissions era was Federal.
 

SiteLock

SiteLock
Back
Top