Car dealers and salesmen wonder...

Dr.Jass

Pastor of Muppets
...why they have bad reputations?

Methinks it's things like this.

Apparently they depend on people doing nothing to make them uphold the deal.
 
060717bill_heard.jpg


I wonder if the big volume counts multiple sales of the same vehicles? :hmmm:
 
What a dickweed, I'd take him to court, and find an attorney that would initiate a class action for the "Hundreds" of other complaints too. Maybe this guy should be sued into bankrupcy!
 
Uhm,.....

After we tried to get their side for days, Bill Heard faxed us a statement just before air time, saying that Kieselhorst "should have known" that the deal he got was too good to be true.


And this is the customers fault HOW???? :wtf::hmmm: The dealership fucked up not the customer....how the fu...wha...why...ahhh fuck it!!!!! :doubt:
 
When Lawyers die do they come back as car dealers? Or is it the other way around? :huh:
 
I can absolutely guarantee you that if I somehow fouled up a deal on a trailer and we lost money, we'd eat it. Mistake or not, a contract is binding, and a bad reputation takes longer to get over than it does to create. I may be a salesman, but I'll never sell cars.
 
I know in my jobs if I screwed up I had to eat it, write it off as experience...and it just so happens to be a Chivy dealer too... they'll screw ya one way or the other...
 
I talked to my wife last night, and we decided we would drive to the dealership and steal it back. Why not? we have a contract and I assume title.....who is gonna hold you as wrong?
 
did he get his trade in back? How much did he have to pay for that?

Civil case not criminal? my hairy ass!
 
I agree. The car was basically stolen, no? That'd be criminal.

I would assume the title would be in hand as well - but the deal happened on a Sunday, so maybe the paperwork was to be finished on Monday and that's when the newb got tore a new one.
 
Just read "bill's" statement, if half of that is true (tn law) sounds like he's gonna get away with it. sad.

It was okay when they were going to make $4500 profit, no?
 
I don't see how it's not criminal, unless somehow ownership did not pass to the customer at that moment. If that's the case, then Bill Heard has to let anyone off the hook who changes their mind in that amount of time, RIGHT? If it actually legally did change hands, then the cops need to put someone in jail for stealing a vehicle. I can tell you one thing-I'd sue the SHIT out of them, whether or not I got the cops to return it to me. They'd NEVER do that again-I'd make it so bad, employees would be talking about the ass raping the dealership took financially for the next 25 years.
 
That bastard's got a chitload of dealerships down here. If I remember right, he's been on the TV news watchdog segments around here too for crooked dealings.

THEY made the mistake. The buyer thought he was getting a good deal, and under the TN law they quoted, the guy's got a solid case. Bill Heard has to prove the buyer knew that a Bill Heard stock number was wrong and that the price given to him by a Bill Heard employee was wrong. That's like trying to prove what I was thinking while I farted just then.
 
Someone with the time, money and a sadistic streak needs to sign a contract to pay a ridiculous amount to them for a vehicle and then stop payment on the check 2 seconds after the deal is inked.
 

SiteLock

SiteLock
Back
Top